Skip to content
No. 331 Season 2017 · Episode 25 · Recorded September 4, 2017

Beg Your Pardon, Joel

9 conversations 1:19:42 With Phil

In this episode

  1. 0:01 1 min

    Show open

    The episode opens with the produced intro voiceover and music, then the live show start from the Pathway studios in Johnston. A host previews the night, including the question of whether an apology is owed to Joel Osteen after the previous week's discussion.

  2. 0:53 4 min

    Easily taken in: the vegan documentary detour

    • Do we owe Joel Osteen an apology?

    After floating the question of whether they owe Joel Osteen an apology, a host explains why he distrusts his own media intake: watching the Netflix documentary What the Health nearly sold him on veganism through the argument that one egg holds a whole chicken's nutrients and through diagrams comparing human intestines to those of meat-eaters. The riff extends to his dog, who crunches kibble open-mouthed and once caught a rabbit, and to Facebook, where he swings from outrage to sympathy on the Osteen and Lakewood story within a day depending on which post he reads.

  3. 5:20 19 min

    Lakewood Church, the Houston flood, and the church's communication failure

    The hosts revisit the previous week's topic: during major Houston flooding, Lakewood Church, Joel Osteen's megachurch meeting in the old Houston Rockets arena, drew outrage for not publicly opening its doors. They agree the world holds Christians to a high standard of visible compassion and that this is a fair liability to carry; the church's real failure was communication, days of silence while people filled in the blanks. A host illustrates with a corporate example, the church-software company Planning Center's radically transparent outage emails, and the rule that if you do not tell people what is going on, they just think you are failing. They allow grace for whatever Lakewood was actually doing behind the scenes, note a satirical Babylon Bee story about Osteen handing out books from a yacht that Snopes debunked, and close on the personal lesson: give context before people assume the worst.

  4. Bit 23:52 4 min

    Noah movie jokes, Kabbalah, and the Epic of Gilgamesh

    The flood topic slides into comedy: jokes about Noah leaving the ark doors open two-by-two and rock creatures that could never get back up if they fell over. One host admits he cannot rewatch the Noah film after its artistic liberties, including rock people with roots in Kabbalah; another explains the Epic of Gilgamesh flood story and reverses the 'Christianity stole it' accusation, arguing both accounts agree there was a worldwide flood, so the common ground is the flood itself. A participant in the room is addressed as Phil during the exchange.

  5. Hard question 27:33 21 min

    What does Jesus mean by a follower? The parable of the sower

    • How does Jesus define the people who follow him, and is 'Christian' the right word for it?

    A host poses the night's hard question: Jesus never says 'Christians are...' and even the Sermon on the Mount and the parable of the soils describe reactions to the kingdom rather than membership categories, so what does a follower of Jesus actually look like, and how did the word Christian drift from that? The hosts work it through: one argues the 'personal savior' crusade model is a modern fabrication and that if you are not a follower you are not following; another frames the barrier as humility, rightly recognizing who God is and who you are, noting the disciples themselves followed imperfectly and kept taking the next step; they agree it is not their job to declare who is in or out, but that love obligates saying something when a professed follower's life shows no fruit, contrasting the disciples' 'is it I?' at the Last Supper with Judas. They cite Robbie and Aaron's addiction-treatment ministry as the contrast case: broken people actively seeking change versus comfortable coworkers who see no need for God.

  6. Game 48:38 20 min

    Secular vs Solomon: the proverb game

    The recurring game: the host reads ten bits of wisdom and the players, joined by Phil in place of the absent fourth host, who is assigned escalating negative points in absentia, must call each 'Solomon' (biblical) or 'Secular' (worldly) plus a country of origin. Rounds include 'a country can be judged by the quality of its proverbs' (secular, Germany), 'a house without a dog or a cat is the house of a scoundrel' (secular, Portugal), and five Proverbs hits: 20:13 on sleep and poverty, 17:8 on the magic-stone bribe, 18:9 on the sluggard, 16:24 on gracious words as honeycomb, and 18:19 on the offended brother. Running gags include guessing Italy for everything, 'hurricane Harvey' submitted as a country of origin, and a 'biblical' mulligan granted to Phil. The final question, 'a society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they shall never sit in,' is secular, Greece. One player wins as the only one left in positive points.

  7. Dear LFTP 1:08:50 5 min

    Dear LFTP: the in-laws who never accept invitations

    • Am I wrong to stop inviting my in-laws after 26 years of refused invitations?

    A listener married twenty-six years writes that her in-laws have never accepted a birthday or special-occasion invitation unless the event is held at their home, including her daughter's college graduation, and asks whether she is wrong to stop inviting them. The hosts say invite them anyway: it costs a text message, it keeps her beyond reproach, and her husband wants them invited; one suggests mischievously announcing the next party at the in-laws' house and letting them be the ones to object. The 'secular answer' agrees, advising her to ask about the rationale years ago and not to use this as punishment, since they are her husband's family. The hosts speculate lightheartedly about a decades-old wedding slight and conclude: send the invitation.

  8. Dear LFTP 1:13:58 5 min

    Dear LFTP: the serial dater

    • Should I try harder to convince my friends this relationship is different, or just enjoy the love I am in?

    A self-described serial dater, engaged once and proposed to three times, never in a relationship longer than a year, says she is four months into a love that feels different, but nobody around her takes it seriously, and asks whether to work harder to convince them or just enjoy it. The hosts land on just enjoying it and letting time do the convincing; her friends' skepticism is earned and fair, since she has shown everyone a track record. One shares moving his own wedding date up and letting people think what they would until time proved otherwise. The 'secular answer' agrees: the harder you try to sell it, the more resistant the buyer becomes. A host's analogy, an alcoholic announcing 'I quit drinking yesterday' after ten years, lands the point that credibility takes time.

  9. 1:18:31 1 min

    Coming up and sign-off

    Housekeeping to close: author Crystal Joy's next book is out and she will be in studio in October; a prison-ministry guest is being scheduled, continuing the thread from Robbie and Aaron's addiction-recovery visit about the good news changing lives even in prison; listeners are pointed to lifefromthepath.org for past Secular vs Solomon rounds and musical numbers. The episode closes with the benediction: be faithful in the means, God will handle the ends.

Now playing
0:00 0:00